GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

Grok 4.7

xAI
$1.60 / $4.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
X
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 4.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7
Input price / 1M$0.37$1.60
Output price / 1M$1.25$4.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$2.40
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.40
Context window1M500K
Max output131K450K
Intelligence index—46.4
Coding index——
Providers14
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Grok 4.7?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 4.1× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.

More comparisons

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Gemini 3.8 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5