Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (35.5 vs 33.7). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Max output | 450K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 35.5 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | 6 | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are priced identically.
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $7,000, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.2Grok 4.7 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGrok 4.7 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs Hy4Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6.1 TerraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGrok 4.7 vs Kimi K3.1 ProGrok 4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Grok 4.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGrok 4.7 vs Gemini 4 ArgonGrok 4.7 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.7 vs Nano Banana 2.1Grok 4.7 vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy4Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro