GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs —).
| GPT Image 2.6 Flare | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | — | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | — | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.25 | — |
| Context window | — | 1.3M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.6 Flare or Llama 4 Scout?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare and Llama 4 Scout are priced identically.
GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Hy4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro