GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs —).
| GPT Image 2.6 Flare | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | — | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | — | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.25 | $0.20 |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.5 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 23 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT Image 2.6 Flare or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare and Kimi K3.1 Pro are priced identically.
GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Hy4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Mistral Large 4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro