Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nano Banana 2.1 has the larger context window (66K vs —).
| Nano Banana 2.1 | GPT Image 2.6 Flare | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.50 | $5.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $7.50 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $1.25 |
| Context window | 66K | — |
| Max output | 59K | — |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2026-11-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
Nano Banana 2.1 and GPT Image 2.6 Flare are priced identically.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare: which has a bigger context window?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Fable 5.2Nano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs Hy4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProNano Banana 2.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProNano Banana 2.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashNano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNano Banana 2.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonNano Banana 2.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Hy4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro