GPT-5.2-Codex vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 32.1× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 400K).
| GPT-5.2-Codex | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | — |
| Context window | 400K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-14 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 32.1× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2-Codex: 400,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2-Codex ≈ $10,500, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5.2-Codex vs Command A+GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5.2-Codex vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5.2-Codex vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Grok 4.7GPT-5.2-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5