GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Terra
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-6.1 Terra is 2.4× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 400K).
| GPT-5.2-Codex | GPT-6.1 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $5.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $2.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.05 |
| Context window | 400K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | 51.3 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-14 | 2026-10-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or GPT-6.1 Terra?
GPT-6.1 Terra is 2.4× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Terra: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2-Codex: 400,000 tokens. GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2-Codex ≈ $10,500, GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Hy4GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Large 4GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro