GPT-5.2-Codex vs Hy4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy4 is 7.7× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 400K).
| GPT-5.2-Codex | Hy4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $0.63 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.021 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | — | 34.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-14 | 2026-11-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Hy4?
Hy4 is 7.7× cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Hy4: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2-Codex: 400,000 tokens. Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2-Codex ≈ $10,500, Hy4 ≈ $1,459.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Large 4GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProHy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro