GPT-5.2-Codex vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro is 17% cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 400K).
| GPT-5.2-Codex | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.75 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $14.00 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.81 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.17 | $0.20 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.5 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 23 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-01-14 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 17% cheaper than GPT-5.2-Codex on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-5.2-Codex: 400,000 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.2-Codex ≈ $10,500, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs Hy4GPT-5.2-Codex vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-5.2-Codex vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-5.2-Codex vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-5.2-Codex vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.2-Codex vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.2-Codex vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Large 4GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro