GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 | Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.84 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.64 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.29 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.016 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 44.8 | — |
| Coding index | 74.8 | — |
| Providers | 34 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-18 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.8 Flash is 5.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 ≈ $3,000, Qwen3.8 Flash ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 vs Command A+GLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5