GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.37$2.00
Output price / 1M$1.25$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons