GLM 5.3 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
StepFun

Step 3.7 Flash

StepFun
$0.20 / $1.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
StepFun
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashStep 3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.0784$1.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.44
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output131K230K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.539.6
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-05-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Step 3.7 Flash ≈ $975.00.

More comparisons