GLM 5.3 Flash vs Relace Apply 3
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 19.2× cheaper than Relace Apply 3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Relace Apply 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.85 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.95 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-09-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Relace Apply 3?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 19.2× cheaper than Relace Apply 3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Relace Apply 3: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Relace Apply 3: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Relace Apply 3 ≈ $2,325.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Relace Apply 3 vs Gemini 4 CarbonRelace Apply 3 vs Claude Fable 5.2Relace Apply 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashRelace Apply 3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashRelace Apply 3 vs Hy4Relace Apply 3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalRelace Apply 3 vs GPT-6.1 TerraRelace Apply 3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro