GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 60.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 27.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.0399$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.0784$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.25
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index27.833.7
Coding index71.576.2
Providers422
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-09-03
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 60.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons