GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen (Alibaba)
$1.03 / $6.16
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 46.7× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.4 vs 27.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.6 Max Preview
Input price / 1M$0.0399$1.03
Output price / 1M$0.0784$6.16
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$2.31
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index27.828.4
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-04-27
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 46.7× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3.6 Max Preview ≈ $5,135.

More comparisons