GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 34% cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 18.2). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.05
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K236K
Intelligence index41.818.2
Coding index71.541.9
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 34% cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons