GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.9× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 21.4). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $0.32 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $2.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.24 | $0.92 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 262K |
| Max output | 944K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | 41.8 | 21.4 |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 53.7 |
| Providers | 31 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-04-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.6 27B?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.9× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.6 27B ≈ $1,990.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.6 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.6 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5