DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.14 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
Z
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 12% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 39.5). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.42$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.0042$0.05
Context window1M1.3M
Max output131K944K
Intelligence index39.541.8
Coding index71.5
Providers2631
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-08-26
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GLM 5.3 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 12% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons