GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.78 / $3.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 31.5× cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 21.3). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3 Max Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.78
Output price / 1M$0.0784$3.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$1.56
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Intelligence index27.821.3
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-02-09
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3 Max Thinking?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 31.5× cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3 Max Thinking ≈ $3,510.

More comparisons