GLM 5.3 Flash vs o1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 530.0× cheaper than o1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $15.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $60.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $26.25 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $7.50 |
| Context window | 1M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 39.7 |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2024-12-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or o1?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 530.0× cheaper than o1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs o1: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. o1: 200,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, o1 ≈ $60,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4o1 vs Gemini 4 Carbono1 vs Claude Fable 5.2o1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 Flasho1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 Flasho1 vs Hy4o1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX Legalo1 vs GPT-6.1 Terrao1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro