GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 12.9). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.05$0.04
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K131K
Intelligence index41.812.9
Coding index71.526.8
Providers314
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons