GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Nemo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 41% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.029 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $0.03 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.0293 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2024-07-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is 41% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Nemo: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Mistral Nemo ≈ $73.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Mistral Nemo vs Gemini 4 CarbonMistral Nemo vs Claude Fable 5.2Mistral Nemo vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMistral Nemo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMistral Nemo vs Hy4Mistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMistral Nemo vs GPT-6.1 TerraMistral Nemo vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro