GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 12.6× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 14.2). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashMistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.15$1.50
Output price / 1M$0.50$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.05
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K210K
Intelligence index41.814.2
Coding index71.546.9
Providers312
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 12.6× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons