GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M2
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.0× cheaper than MiniMax M2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | MiniMax M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.26 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $1.02 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.45 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-05 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiniMax M2?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.0× cheaper than MiniMax M2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M2: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. MiniMax M2: 204,800 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, MiniMax M2 ≈ $1,020.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4MiniMax M2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M2 vs Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiniMax M2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax M2 vs Hy4MiniMax M2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiniMax M2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro