GLM 5.3 Flash vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3 8B Lunaris

Sao10k
$0.04 / $0.05
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
S
Verdict: Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 14% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
GLM 5.3 FlashLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.04
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.05
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.0425
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M8K
Max output131K7K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262024-08-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Llama 3 8B Lunaris?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 14% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Llama 3 8B Lunaris ≈ $105.00.

More comparisons