GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 83.7× cheaper than Kimi K3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 17.4).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.19 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $16.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $4.14 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.18 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | 17.4 |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 72 |
| Providers | 42 | 27 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-07-16 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Kimi K3?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 83.7× cheaper than Kimi K3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Kimi K3 ≈ $8,384.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Kimi K3 vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3 vs Hy4Kimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3 vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro