GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2 0711
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 20.2× cheaper than Kimi K2 0711 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Kimi K2 0711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.57 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $2.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 98K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-07-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Kimi K2 0711?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 20.2× cheaper than Kimi K2 0711 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2 0711: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K2 0711: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Kimi K2 0711 ≈ $2,290.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Kimi K2 0711 vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K2 0711 vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K2 0711 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K2 0711 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K2 0711 vs Hy4Kimi K2 0711 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K2 0711 vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K2 0711 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro