GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Tencent

Hunyuan A13B Instruct

Tencent
$0.14 / $0.57
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Tencent
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.0× cheaper than Hunyuan A13B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashHunyuan A13B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.57
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.25
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window1M131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262025-07-08
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Hunyuan A13B Instruct?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 5.0× cheaper than Hunyuan A13B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Hunyuan A13B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Hunyuan A13B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Hunyuan A13B Instruct ≈ $565.00.

More comparisons