GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.2× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 33.7). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.2 | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.04 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.24 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.12 | $0.05 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 33.7 | 41.8 |
| Coding index | 68.8 | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 31 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-16 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.2× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.2 ≈ $2,320, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Command A+GLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5