GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.7× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| GLM 5.2 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.04 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.12 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 33.7 | — |
| Coding index | 68.8 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-16 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.7× cheaper than GLM 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.2 ≈ $2,320, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Command A+GLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5