GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.2 is 2.4× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 33.7). GLM 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| GLM 5.2 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.04 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.12 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 131K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | 33.7 | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 68.8 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-16 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Grok 4.7?
GLM 5.2 is 2.4× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.2 ≈ $2,320, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.2 vs Command A+GLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5