Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemma 4 31B

Google
$0.20 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.40 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Gemma 4 31B is 5.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.4 vs 4.4). Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemma 4 31BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.40
Output price / 1M$0.40$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.25$1.30
Cached input / 1M——
Context window262K131K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index4.413.4
Coding index43.4—
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-022025-09-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Gemma 4 31B is 5.2× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 4 31B ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ≈ $2,800.

More comparisons