Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 4 31B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemma 4 31B

Google
$0.20 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 20% cheaper than Gemma 4 31B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 4.4). Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 4 31B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.25
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M262K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index36.54.4
Coding index—43.4
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-04-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 20% cheaper than Gemma 4 31B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 4 31B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Gemma 4 31B ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons