Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 4.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 8K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 2K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 4.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Hy4Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 TerraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro