Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 2 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemma 2 27B

Google
$0.65 / $0.65
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 3.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2 27B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.65
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.65
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.65
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M8K
Max output128K2K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-072024-07-13
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Gemma 2 27B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 3.3× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemma 2 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625.

More comparisons