Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Gemma 2 27B is 3.1× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | GPT-6.1 Terra | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $5.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $2.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.05 |
| Context window | 8K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 2K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | — | 51.3 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 7 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-10-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or GPT-6.1 Terra?
Gemma 2 27B is 3.1× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Hy4Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 Pro