Gemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.5× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.60 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.26 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.015 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 524K |
| Intelligence index | — | 29.1 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 11 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-10-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.5× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Hy4Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 TerraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro