Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 13.1× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Gemma 2 27B | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.0399 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.65 | $0.0784 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.65 | $0.0495 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 27.8 |
| Coding index | — | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 42 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 13.1× cheaper than Gemma 2 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemma 2 27B ≈ $1,625, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.
More comparisons
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 CarbonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Fable 5.2Gemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs Hy4Gemma 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 TerraGemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGemma 2 27B vs Kimi K3.1 ProGemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Gemma 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGemma 2 27B vs Gemini 4 ArgonGemma 2 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Gemma 2 27B vs Nano Banana 2.1Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro