Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has the larger context window (82K vs 66K).
Nano Banana 2.1Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Output price / 1M$7.50$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.75
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K82K
Max output59K33K
Intelligence index—9.8
Coding index—12.1
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-062025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.0× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons