Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google

$0.30 / $2.50

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).

	Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.30	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$2.50	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$0.85	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	$0.03	$0.0028
Context window	33K	1M
Max output	8K	131K
Intelligence index	—	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	—	2
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	99.9%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	No	Yes
Tool calling	No	Yes
Released	2025-10-07	2026-09-21
Retirement	2027-03-15	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.9× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons