Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Google
$0.30 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.0399
Output price / 1M$2.50$0.0784
Blended price (3:1)$0.85$0.0495
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.03
Context window33K1M
Max output8K131K
Intelligence index—27.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers—42
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-072026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 17.2× cheaper than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): 32,768 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ≈ $1,850, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.

More comparisons