Extract vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Extract on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Extract | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.04 | $0.013 |
| Output price / 1M | Free | $0.0168 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.03 | $0.014 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0119 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 900K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 27.8 |
| Coding index | — | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 40 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Extract or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.2× cheaper than Extract on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Extract vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Extract: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Extract ≈ $80.00, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $34.40.
More comparisons
Extract vs GPT-6.1 TerraExtract vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProExtract vs Kimi K3.1 ProExtract vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashExtract vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Extract vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLExtract vs Gemini 4 ArgonExtract vs Claude Haiku 5.5Extract vs Nano Banana 2.1Extract vs Mistral Large 4Extract vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProExtract vs GPT-6.1 SolExtract vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Extract vs GLM 5.3 PrimeExtract vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeExtract vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5