Ember-1 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 40.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ember-1 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Ember-1 | Ministral 3 8B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.15 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 944K | 210K |
| Intelligence index | — | 5.5 |
| Coding index | — | 9.7 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 98.4% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-24 | 2025-12-02 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Ministral 3 8B 2512?
Ministral 3 8B 2512 is 40.0× cheaper than Ember-1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ember-1 vs Ministral 3 8B 2512: which has a bigger context window?
Ember-1: 1,048,576 tokens. Ministral 3 8B 2512: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ember-1 ≈ $13,500, Ministral 3 8B 2512 ≈ $375.00.
More comparisons
Ember-1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeEmber-1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeEmber-1 vs Command A+Ember-1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 LunaEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProEmber-1 vs GPT-6 SolEmber-1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Ember-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedEmber-1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashEmber-1 vs Grok 4.7Ember-1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashEmber-1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXEmber-1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashEmber-1 vs GPT-6 AstraEmber-1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Command A+Ministral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 Luna ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 LunaMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 Sol ProMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs GPT-6 SolMinistral 3 8B 2512 vs Claude Opus 5.5