DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.14 / $0.42

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.80 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.80
Output price / 1M	$0.42	$1.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.21	$0.85
Cached input / 1M	$0.0042	$0.40
Context window	1M	128K
Max output	131K	115K
Intelligence index	39.5	—
Coding index	—	—
Providers	26	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	No
Released	2026-09-10	2025-02-01
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons