DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.40$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.004$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output944K115K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers36—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-102025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 7.3× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons