DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 5.2× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny
Input price / 1M$0.022$0.015
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.045
Blended price (3:1)$0.12$0.0225
Cached input / 1M$0.004$0.003
Context window1M262K
Max output944K250K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—26.5
Providers36—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-08-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Tiny?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 5.2× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.

More comparisons