DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.60 / $3.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 9.2× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.60
Output price / 1M$0.29$3.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$1.35
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.12
Context window1M262K
Max output393K64K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—48.2
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-02-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 9.2× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons