DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.6 vs 9.8). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.29$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M82K
Max output393K33K
Intelligence index28.69.8
Coding index—12.1
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.1× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons