DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.80 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.29$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.85
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.40
Context window1M128K
Max output393K115K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 5.8× cheaper than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct ≈ $2,100.

More comparisons