DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
NVIDIA
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 26% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M131K
Max output393K118K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers471
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 26% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons