DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

DeepSeek

$0.11 / $4.44

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi

$0.14 / $0.28

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26.7 vs 23.1). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.11	$0.14
Output price / 1M	$4.44	$0.28
Blended price (3:1)	$1.19	$0.18
Cached input / 1M	$0.097	$0.0028
Context window	1M	1.1M
Max output	944K	131K
Intelligence index	23.1	26.7
Coding index	68.8	—
Providers	24	8
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-08-12	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6.8× cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ≈ $2,442, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons